You have read a book that you somewhat agree with and whose author you are unsure of and you use it as evidence for you to call my persepective bizarre?
I found a book called Early Christian Heresies by Joan O’Grady on Amazon.com. It is such a riveting book that not only did it not have a precis or description, it had no customer feedback. And no cover picture.
So I looked up Joan O’Grady. She appears to be a neo-Gnostic and has written several books on Christian mysticism. Is this the best evidence that you can come up with?
Your self contradicting posts are the primary source for my opinion. However, from what I have read in several places, your take on how Rome became prime seems a whole lot rosier than reality. You seem to gloss over the times they either exiled or murdered even those who were once their brothers.
found a book called Early Christian Heresies by Joan OGrady on Amazon.com. It is such a riveting book that not only did it not have a precis or description, it had no customer feedback. And no cover picture.
This is the book.
So I looked up Joan OGrady. She appears to be a neo-Gnostic and has written several books on Christian mysticism. Is this the best evidence that you can come up with?
I have no idea who the author is. I just read the book because a friend loaned it to me. It addresses some questions I had, but questions of history, nothing relating to salvation issues. There is only one Book I have that addresses those.