Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DouglasKC

My point is that the holy days that were part of the old covenant with the nation of Israel are not binding on Christians. Paul makes it clear that binding anything from the old law would make one a debtor to the whole law.


180 posted on 04/04/2007 5:48:03 AM PDT by jkl1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: jkl1122
My point is that the holy days that were part of the old covenant with the nation of Israel are not binding on Christians. Paul makes it clear that binding anything from the old law would make one a debtor to the whole law.

That of course raises a number of questions.

Where does it say that the holy days were part of the old covenant? And where does it say that they're not part of the new covenant?

Does this mean that there is no law under the new covenant...that man is "free" to sin...to transgress God's law?

196 posted on 04/04/2007 11:08:42 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson