That’s not what you asked for though. You asked for names. I provided names. Again, my point was that a pre-trib rapture is not synonymous with dispensationalism. That there were non-dispensationalists that believe in a pre-trib rapture. How they do it is beyond me. I agree, they are inconsistent in their beliefs.
I am not in their camp.
I am in the camp of such great teachers/preachers as Arthur W. Pink, Charles Stanley, John Macarthur, Adrian Rodgers, Norm Geisler, Charles Ryrie, and John Walvoord. I do not agree with each of them on necessarily every point of doctrine, but we agree on more than we disagree based upon our study of Scripture. Please don’t disdain those who love the Word of God thoroughly but don’t come to the same conclusion as yourself.
I am in the camp of such great teachers/preachers as Arthur W. Pink
This Arthur W. Pink?
"But there is further reason, and a pressing one today, why we should write upon our present subject, and that is to expose the modern and pernicious error of Dispensationalism. This is a device of the Enemy, designed to rob the children of no small part of that bread which their heavenly Father has provided for their souls; ... his modern method of mishandling the Scriptures—for modern it certainly is, being quite unknown to Christendom till little more than a century ago, and only within recent years being adopted by those who are outside the narrow circle where it originated"
I'm really not here to play games with you.
You made an somewhat questionable claim; i.e., there are non-dispensationalist who believe in a pre-trib rapture.
I asked you to be specific and name names.
You gave me one name; Benny Hinn.
We laughed a bit, and then you have not provided any other names, yet you repeated your questionable claim.
I'm not going to chase you down rabbit holes. Either your "yes" is "yes" or it isn't.