There’s a big difference between mystical and spiritual.
Most non-Romanist Christians understand that. It’s pretty “easy” to grasp from a correct reading of Scripture.
“There’s a big difference between mystical and spiritual.”
To follow on then with TomSmedley’s line of argument, what is it exactly about the “baptistic” presentation of the Gospel that you find to be overly “mystical”?
In other words, why are you knocking the baptistic presentation of the Gospel? Where is it deficient? Why do you consider the reformed presentation better?