"The bogus translation you gave is your problem, because it doesn't jive with any published meanings."
I got it from a published source, so that is clearly false.
"Then you focused on petty differences that have no relevance to the meaning of what you gave."
That's exactly what you've been doing with this whole "est non" nonsense. You've managed to get completely off the insults you delivered to people who know or believe that there is a God.
"For someone that claims to be fluent in Latin"
Is unwarranted assumption the only weapon in your arsenal? I made no claim of fluency.
"you're doing a piss poor job playin' stump the chump with the ignorant."
Not at all. I've gotten you to admit that you have no support for your position above and beyond your assumption that it couldn't be true (that is, it isn't true because it couldn't be true, and because it couldn't be true, it isn't true), and that's pretty much enough for anyone who recognizes circular logic when he sees it.
I've already covered all the relevant matters. Have a nice day.