Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: NYer
As you note, this is a question confronted by so many today and it is truly painful. How many simply 'close their eyes' to our Lord's words in order to enjoy a few fleeting hours with their loved ones

I don't agree with this response. We haven't seen any reason not to accept these people into our homes. Obviously, we would avoid providing them with the occasion of sin and wouldn't allow them privacy (not a problem in our house!) but to have these people over for dinner, etc. Why not? Christ sat down with the tax collecters. We don't have a litmus test for purity on our door and I wonder exactly what kind of sinners would be ok?

13 posted on 03/27/2007 10:57:10 AM PDT by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: old and tired; Palladin; swmobuffalo; the OlLine Rebel; trisham
Christ sat down with the tax collecters.

True. But you have taken the event out of context. Jesus called to Matthew, the Tax Collector, to follow him. This following meant imitating the pattern of his life - not just walking after him.

As he sat at table in the house, behold many tax collectors and sinners came and sat down with Jesus and his disciples.

This conversion of one tax collector gave many men, those from his own profession and other sinners, an example of repentance and pardon. No sooner was he converted than Matthew drew after him a whole crowd of sinners along the same road to salvation.

It was Matthew who invited Jesus to dine with him, not the other way around. The 'sinners' were drawn to the one who was already converted.

20 posted on 03/27/2007 11:28:57 AM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: old and tired

I would agree with you ONLY if you took the opportunity of a family gathering to discuss the sinful nature of their relationship with them and ask them to change their ways.

If you view this as being preachy or offensive, then your example of Jesus sitting down with tax collectors is irrelevant.


44 posted on 03/27/2007 12:46:14 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: old and tired; NYer
We don't have a litmus test for purity on our door and I wonder exactly what kind of sinners would be ok?

But that isn't what was said, was it?

The message was not "Begone, you sinners." It was "You are welcome to come over, but we refuse to recognize your trial marraige to your lover, therefore they are not welcome to join us until they move out of your house, because we refuse to pretend that you are a normal couple entitled to the respect a normal couple deserves."

It is the same message that should be given to divorced people. As individuals, it is fine to have them over. But it is wrong to pretend they are married and invite them as a couple, when they are really adulterers living in sin. All that recognizing divorcee-adulterers and people living in concubinage, and sodomites living together as legitimate relationships does is harden these people in their sin by deluding them into thinking they have done something socially acceptable, and not just acceptable, but praiseworthy and good.

68 posted on 03/27/2007 5:07:24 PM PDT by Andrew Byler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson