I'm not saying it is not a part of biblical prophecy.
Obviously, if they don't ever rebuild their temple, then it was a wrong scriptural interpretation to include it as an item of futurist biblical interpretation.
If they do rebuild it, then it leaves open the possibility that the Futurists are right. Therefore, It does, in fact, strenghten their position in that they had being predicting the rebuilding as the correct way to interpret scripture..
But they can't just rebuild any old temple, correct? Doesn't it have to fit the exact specifications of Ezekiel 40-48 for it to be the rebuilt temple of the futurists?
We know that anything not fitting this description of bogus from the very start. Or am I missing something of the futurist theory?