Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: iranger

"But by definition, bulimia is binge eating followed by purging and that is just the physical characteristics of the disorder. Once you start considering the emotional complications involved in bulimia, the analogy gets even more difficult to make. So like I said, neither analogy does the topic justice."

When I first heard the bulimia analogy it made me wonder about gastric bypasses.

If it is bad to "mutilate" your body to obstruct the natural gift of fertility....why isn't the Church opposed to stomach stapling for the same reason?


57 posted on 03/19/2007 8:03:09 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Scotswife

lol...touche'


58 posted on 03/19/2007 9:28:41 PM PDT by iranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Scotswife; sitetest

Pregnancy and lactation are the only body system functions I can think of which are potential in the adult. Everything else is actual: the heart pumps blood, the stomach digests, the intestines absorb, the kidneys filter, the muscles move, endocrines regulate, the nerves transmit...

And it is this potential function of pregnancy which is somehow set apart in the Church. You can remove an organ if it becomes dangerous or potentially dangerous to you, or even very inconvenient. A gangrenous limb - off. A cancerous lung - out. Breasts with a high risk of cancer - you may remove. A gall bladder that keeps making gallstones, or a uterus with bad fibroids - you may remove. A cancerous prostate whose removal will cause impotence - you may remove. Ovaries with a high risk of cancer - you may remove. Even a cancerous pregnant uterus you may remove. An ectopic pregnancy you may remove - if you treat it as a diseased fallopian tube and not as a pregnancy.

But if it is the state of pregnancy itself that is dangerous - if pregnancy would overtax a weak heart or kidneys - if it would with a very high likelihood cause hyperemesis gravidarum or severe early preeclampsia - tough, suck it up, offer it up. You may not remove the potential of pregnancy for the purpose of removing its potential danger.

Mrs VS


60 posted on 03/19/2007 10:06:24 PM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Scotswife

Dear Scotswife,

"If it is bad to 'mutilate' your body to obstruct the natural gift of fertility....why isn't the Church opposed to stomach stapling for the same reason?"

Obesity is a disease. Pregnancy isn't.

Surgery to cure a disease, or to correct something that's not working properly in the body is surgery, is medicine. Surgery to remove or break something that is working properly is mutilation.


sitetest


62 posted on 03/20/2007 6:41:11 AM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson