Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: iranger

Dear iranger,

Again, the analogy works perfectly well to illuminate the question of means versus ends without achieving an identity in every detail.

Frankly, though, when I think about the emotional complications involved in bulimia, it seems to me to make the analogy more apt. Having personally moved over the years from a position of accepting artificial contraception as a moral device to one that rejects that view, what I see in the "rearview mirror" is that acceptance of artificial contraception distorts thinking about marital relations.

See my post #20. It's a viewpoint the underlying premises of which I fought for years and years. I expect that for folks not ready to accept the truth about artificial contraception, it's a viewpoint that will encounter rejection.


sitetest


49 posted on 03/19/2007 2:05:57 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: sitetest

Sorry site...there is no logical flow here. I honestly can't discern much deductive argument out of your posts. Sheer accumulation of words and random ideas do not an argument make. My apologies if this sounds harsh as I'm pressed for time but I really don't think you've done anything other than try to support a bad analogy. I willingfully will back away from mine as I agree its full of holes but the bulimia thing is equally full of holes. Cheers!


51 posted on 03/19/2007 2:20:45 PM PDT by iranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson