He said "but rather treating what is written with neglect, as if it were cast forth without purpose, and at random." I never said there was no purpose to scriptures or that they were generated "at random." But it wasn't his to pronounce judgment either.
6 But that no such effect may ensue, let us give strict heed unto the things that are written;
Something about that you do not understand?
22. Why, then, was holy Scripture given?
To this end, that divine revelation might be preserved more exactly and unchangeably. In holy Scripture we read the words of the Prophets and Apostles precisely (emphasis added) as if we were living with them and listening to them, although the latest of the sacred books were written a thousand and some hundred years before our time.
23. Must we follow holy tradition, even when we possess holy Scripture?
We must follow that tradition which agrees with the divine revelation and with holy Scripture, as is taught us by holy Scripture itself. The Apostle Paul writes: Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word or our epistle. 2 Thess. ii. 15.
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/creeds2.vi.iii.i.html
Those are statements that any Bible believing Christian could agree with.
Now,if you have any more diagreements with our view on Sacred Scripture, you can argue with your own theologicans, since this Creed showed that some of your theologians agreed with us regarding the Hebrew scriptures, Apocrypha and importance of Scripture.