Buddha said "The things of G-d are unknown, and unknowable, so why argue."
Until YHWH calls me on the phone, I will remain agnostic on the burning issue of how IESU relates to YHWH.
I see references both ways. I also see lots of people who vote, but I don't see their letters from divine sources that would be sufficient to clarify the matter. If that makes me an Arian heritic, or a Nestorian, so be it.
Don't flatter yourself. The Arians and Nestorians were philosophically and theologically very advanced, very deep thinking people who just happened to be wrong on a single point.
YOu sound like a garden-variety New-age bubble-head in comparison.
And you do great violence to Buddha with your quote; the founders of the Catholic faith also said that the ways of God were mysterious and unknowable, but both found trying to grasp what little we could to be highly providential; and that there are a great many worthwhile, knowable things.