Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/11/2007 7:31:49 AM PST by sionnsar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ahadams2; Way4Him; Peach; Zippo44; piperpilot; ex-Texan; ableLight; rogue yam; neodad; Tribemike; ..
Thanks to ken5050 for the note.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar, Huber and newheart.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
More Anglican articles here.

Humor: The Anglican Blue (by Huber)

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

2 posted on 02/11/2007 7:33:09 AM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com†|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sionnsar; steelie; ken5050

These are two excellent points.

"One excellent Georgia lawyer gave me the following illustration.

1. If you own your home, and join Rotary, and then Rotary passes bylaws claiming that members' houses are held in trust for Rotary, and then you quit Rotary, do you have to sign over the title of your house to Rotary? Obviously not. Rotary can pass resolutions and bylaws until they're blue in the face, but that still doesn't give them ownership of your property because they had no original authority over your property to pass by bylaw to begin with. Likewise, if you (the parish) own your property, your membership in an organization (denomination) that's passed bylaws claiming ownership of your property is irrelevant. If you have the title, you paid for it, and signed no contract giving the denomination interest in your property, you should own it in the clear. The courts exist to enforce governmental law, not church law and not Rotary law.

2. I'm pretty sure that if the Diocese of Atlanta had title to the property, Alexander would have jumped to say so in his opening paragraph. He's actually put forward a weak case in his opening paragraph. Does he mean that the only thing he can point to, to claim ownership of the parish property, is a 1976 petition and a parish bylaw?


5 posted on 02/11/2007 8:47:03 AM PST by Grampa Dave (GW has more Honor and Integrity in his little finger than ALL of the losers on the "hate Bush" band)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sionnsar

Drove by St. Andrew's this morning. The place was packed, with cars parked all over the grass. I was curious whether the sign still advertised the Episcopal Church; it did, with the logo still untouched.


6 posted on 02/11/2007 9:01:15 AM PST by madprof98 ("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson