Too bad that the everyday churchgoer doesn't realize the amount of poor interpretation and outright lies there are in the KJV and in most "Church" doctrine.
Worshipping the Trinity is hardly different that worshipping the Baalim.
Your blunt assessment is hardly different from the prevailing opinon of some of the Pharisees...
Matthew 12:22-32 refers....
KJV really has nothing to do with it ... every reputable translation includes the trinitarian formula in Matthew 28.
Further, even without it the doctrine of the Trinity is firmly established ... not by any isolated proof text, but by the overwhelming testimony of the whole of Scripture.
Too bad the Bible disagrees. Of course, if the baptismal passage hammered on above (though hardly disproved) was the only basis for the doctrine, that would be one thing. For those who read and understand scripture as a whole, this article is laughable.