Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins; Lexinom
I believe the Constitution foresaw military operations short of war. At the time these were covered by "letters of marque and reprisal." Privateers were ships licensed to prey on the vessels of other nations with whom we had a bone to pick.

Yes, Ron Paul introduced the "Marque and Reprisal Act of 2001" back on October 11, 2001 (to "allow Congress to authorize the President to specifically target Bin Laden and his associates using non-government armed forces") and "The Air Piracy Reprisal and Capture Act of 2001" as additional tools in tracking and destroying terror cells.

25 posted on 02/03/2007 3:28:02 PM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian (We are Unworthy Servants; We have only done Our Duty -- Luke 17:10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

Did anyone in the Federalist papers ever define the word "war?" Were there others in those early days who saw operations short of all-out societal war being legitimate objectives for our military forces?


33 posted on 02/03/2007 3:35:49 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson