Posted on 01/30/2007 4:21:46 PM PST by Huber
The former leader of the Anglican Communion, Archbishop George Carey, will speak on campus on his churchs heritage and future Wednesday, Feb. 7, at 2:30 p.m. The address will be in room 0016 Westbrook in the Divinity School and is free and open to the public. Duke Today interviewed Carey by phone in London.
How do you understand the current debates in the church about homosexuality, unity and biblical authority?
All traditions, all denominations are having to face up to this issue of human sexuality. At the [worldwide meeting of bishops at the] Lambeth Conference, which I presided over in 1998 in Canterbury, there was a very remarkable resolution, which I was wholly in favor of, which expressed its view that practicing homosexuality was wrong, but we must listen to homosexuals and continue a journey together. That was overwhelmingly accepted. But then, of course, in 2003, the American church, The Episcopal Church of the United States, decided to break from that position and so Gene Robinson [an openly gay priest] was ordained bishop. Thats been the heart of the issue every since. There are very strong forces on both sides, and I would also want to emphasize that there are good, noble people on both sides of the argument. We should not demonize one another.
You opposed blessing homosexual relationships, but you were in favor of womens ordination. Those two positions arent often held by the same person. How do you understand them going together?
I dont see any problem whatsoever. On the one hand, the ordination of women is a very clear mandate in scripture, [which speaks] about womens gifts being used in the church. I was working from that biblical premise and a theology of the equality of male and female. The issue of homosexuality is on a different basis all together. We are talking not about homosexuals being allowed or not allowed to be ordained. Of course, anyone can be ordained, but the lifestyle thats required in scripture and in the Christian tradition is that ordination is open to either single, celibate men or a married priesthood. You cant have a third order coming in. The ordination of practicing homosexuals throws up enormous challenges sacramentally about marriage, about [clerical] orders, about ordination itself. These are not easy issues to deal with.
Youve ministered in many countries around the world. What lessons would you bring from Christians in other countries to Christians in the U.S.?
I would make two particular points. One is that the American church, in spite of the American bashing that goes on in some places today, is still widely appreciated for its generosity, support for the weaker churches, and so on . But what we can learn the other hand is the sheer enthusiasm of the Christians who have very little in the way of materialism, materialistic objects and possessions, and their love of God is tremendous. In Sudan, to the see the poverty and to see the faith strident in the face of persecution, one always comes back home humbled by their dedication, their love, their singing, the joy that goes on, the spontaneity of worship. Sometimes our very professional, rather cold liturgy is shamed by that fervency and the dynamism and the suffering of these wonderful people. So theres a lot we can learn from one another. They need a lot of our strength, and we need certainly some of their enthusiasm of life.
How did becoming Archbishop of Canterbury change your relationship with Jesus?
Many a time during my 11 1/2 years, I pinched myself and said, What am I doing in a great office like this and meeting some many wonderful people around the world?
. Ill give an illustration. The first time I had an audience with the queen ..., I was driving back in my car -- the back of the car, chauffer driven, back to Lambeth Palace -- I was getting back to the next thing, and I suddenly thought, Here am I, Ive just met this amazing person Queen Elizabeth, and here am I going on to the next thing as if actually she didnt matter. So I learned the secret of simply mulling over and enjoying these opportunities and savoring them and reflecting on them deeply. But of course then the other side of this were the many, many thousands -- hundreds of thousands -- of very ordinary people, ordinary Christians who are getting on with the job. It was such a delight to minister to them and that informed my own personal Christian foundation and journey, seeing God at work in many different situations in many different parts of the world.
Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Click FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search for a list of all related articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Translation: "I don't want to offend anyone, so it's not easy to say something that I know is eternal truth."
Carey is askew.
QEII will die and be dust to dust.
Doesn't sound so purdy now, does it? These kinds of phrases soften the seriousness of homosexuality as a sexual sin. Naming a homosexual as a bishop is just looked at as another step on the journey together.
Uh, apparently you didn't understand what I was saying or didn't read my entire post.
My point was that no sexual sin should be treated 'softly' by the church, including homosexuality. The statement I had copied/pasted sounded all soft and gushy, like homosexuality was a 'lesser' sexual sin that pedophilia. As you have yourself stated, it is not.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.