Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Early Church Fathers
Stay Catholic ^ | Sebastian R. Fama

Posted on 01/27/2007 6:12:35 AM PST by NYer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-173 next last
To: Kolokotronis

Have you ever heard "And Can It Be" sung loudly and with feeling?!

Amazing Love!


61 posted on 01/27/2007 9:05:46 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Comment #62 Removed by Moderator

To: narses

As long as the Caucus speaks to its own confession and does not speak of or for another confession - there is no question whether the thread can remain closed.


63 posted on 01/27/2007 9:12:06 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Well, NYer, I've now read 59 posts on this thread. The reaction of some of the Protestants to it is exactly why I have in the past remarked about the use of the term "Catholic" on these threads when the subject is the theology of The Church, especially if one is going to discuss the Fathers. It ALWAYS leads to some attack on the Roman Church when an otherwise interesting and potentially valuable discussion of patristics, from an era long before the Reformation and having little or nothing to do with the excesses of the Medieval Latin Church against which the Protestants revolted, could have occurred.


64 posted on 01/27/2007 9:14:23 AM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: sandyeggo

And no doubt a Protestant Caucus might present statements it considers as "thoughtful addressing of the [Catholic] POV." Nevertheless, if any Catholic were to find the statement to be false, incomplete, a strawman argument - the thread should be opened for his rebuttal.


66 posted on 01/27/2007 9:15:33 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

To: narses; NYer; Religion Moderator
It was the sentence: "If the Protestant hypothesis is correct, the gates of hell did some serious prevailing and Jesus Christ is a liar." which made me think this thread did not deserve a protected status, otherwise I would not have posted here. (Unless it was to praise this or that, etc.)

The author's statement seems to imply that the only way Protestants can be correct is for Christ to be a liar, an assertion which is difficult to ignore.

68 posted on 01/27/2007 9:17:24 AM PST by Enosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo

I disagree. Most news articles concerning the Church, the Catechism, items in the Catholic Encyclopedia and Catholic web pages would be eligible for a Catholic Caucus designation.


69 posted on 01/27/2007 9:19:11 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo; Religion Moderator

I agree that a "caucus thread" is difficult. It is not impossible, however.

If the discussion involves another group, then it is not a caucus.

If it discusses doctrine that is peculiar to your group and disagreed with by another group, that is different, and it should be a legitimate caucus. If the caucus members start bashing the other groups, then they've violated the caucus. Their best bet is to request the poster to ask for his "bashing" posts to be deleted by the Mod.

You could, for example, have a caucus around the "Assumption of Mary." It would only be a problem if your people start bashing others who don't accept that doctrine.

That raises a question for the mod: What if a "devotional thread" starts in a polemical direction against another "confession?"


70 posted on 01/27/2007 9:20:00 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: xzins

"Have you ever heard "And Can It Be" sung loudly and with feeling?!

Amazing Love!"

Indeed I have. I've sung it myself that way. When I was a teenager I went to Phillips Exeter. We had chapel everyday and sang almost all of C. Wesley's hymns, including "And Can It Be". That's where I developed a lifelong love of them. I actually have a multi cd set of his hymns which we listen to here at home and in the car. What strikes me most is the profund theological poetry and confidence of the hymns. Its almost as if he were a later, Western version of +Romanos the Melodist.

Right now, however, I am listening to some chanting from the Divine Liturgy in Old Slavonic. :)


72 posted on 01/27/2007 9:24:46 AM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: xzins
What if a "devotional thread" starts in a polemical direction against another "confession?"

Then it should be considered open to rebuttal. No confession gets to use the "Closed" designation to take pot shots at another confession.
73 posted on 01/27/2007 9:24:54 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

Comment #74 Removed by Moderator

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: sandyeggo
It sounded like a recounting of history to me, but since a member of the Protestant confession found the statements to be false, incomplete, a strawman argument - they need to be able to mount a rebuttal. Therefore I opened the thread.

Likewise I'm sure there are statements a Protestant Caucus might make about the Catholic Church that would sound like a recounting of history to me - but in the eyes of a member of the Catholic confession might be seen as false, incomplete, a strawman argument, etc. And in that case, I would open the Protestant Caucus for rebuttal also.

76 posted on 01/27/2007 9:29:47 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo

The "Assumption of Mary" thread is one I would have declared a Catholic Caucus had I posted it, to keep it reverent.


77 posted on 01/27/2007 9:31:31 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo; Religion Moderator

If it is not labeled as a closed thread, then it is open for rebuttal.

If it is labeled as a closed thread, and is unjustly disrupted, then my take is that the RM will delete the offensive posts and warn the disrupter.


78 posted on 01/27/2007 9:34:14 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

Comment #79 Removed by Moderator

To: Religion Moderator; NYer

I would say they are not iron cast fact facts, but opinions of the author regarding another confession. Since the post repeatedly mentions Proddies by name the thread should be open to Proddies.

It's the equivalent of the convention on FR that if you mention a poster, you ping the poster. I'm not saying they should ping us, but they shouldn't be able to talk about us without us being able to throw our 00.2 cents in....


80 posted on 01/27/2007 9:37:39 AM PST by Gamecock (Ecclesia reformata, semper reformanda secundum verbum Dei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson