Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Rutles4Ever
"We have to rely on the hearsay of Luke dozens of years after the fact, and no eyewitness account. If, in your estimation, proximity is truth, your logic makes Luke's Gospel especially specious."

Luke knew both Paul and Peter.

272 posted on 01/25/2007 10:31:47 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]


To: spunkets

We have no proof that he talked to Peter, an eyewitness. Paul was not an eyewitness.


275 posted on 01/25/2007 10:40:16 AM PST by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson