To: vox_freedom; Canticle_of_Deborah
Wuerl's stand on lawmakers who back abortion angers some conservative CatholicsYet Archbishop Chaput gets a free pass. Go figure.
9 posted on
01/22/2007 8:48:29 AM PST by
murphE
(These are days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed but his own. --G.K. Chesterton)
To: murphE
Chaput has taken Ritter on as far as the abortion issue is concerned.
I want to know if Wuerl is ready to explain to Ms. Pelosi, at the general judgment, why he didn't love her enough to help her along the path of truth?
10 posted on
01/22/2007 8:56:09 AM PST by
mockingbyrd
(Good heavens! What women these Christians have-----Libanus)
To: murphE
Of course there is a difference between "conservative Catholics" and "traditionalist Catholics." Chaput and Wuerl have been considered "conservatives," and perhaps they are given the far left political spectrum of this day and age. Yet we have seen both of these guys attempt to appease politicians instead of instructing them
and their flocks on right vs. wrong, good vs. evil, virtue vs. sin.
This is one of the reasons I've kept my tagline for a while now ... so as to proclaim there must be no hedging, obfuscation, or doublespeak when it comes to God and His teachings. St. Matthew said as much, and we must expect the direct and full truth from local bishops. Nothing more, nothing less.
15 posted on
01/22/2007 9:47:09 AM PST by
vox_freedom
(Matthew 5:37 But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no)
To: murphE
It's all part of the cafeteria Catholicism practiced even by self described conservative Catholics.
20 posted on
01/22/2007 10:22:39 AM PST by
Canticle_of_Deborah
(The N.O. Mass is like a box of chocolates. You never know what you're gonna get.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson