1 posted on
01/09/2007 3:09:14 PM PST by
sionnsar
To: ahadams2; Peach; Zippo44; piperpilot; ex-Texan; ableLight; rogue yam; neodad; Tribemike; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by
sionnsar,
Huber and
newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com More Anglican articles
here.
Humor:
The Anglican Blue (by Huber)
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
2 posted on
01/09/2007 3:09:48 PM PST by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com†|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: sionnsar
Rearranging the deck chairs on a doomed ship?
3 posted on
01/09/2007 3:40:35 PM PST by
Pyro7480
("Give me an army saying the Rosary and I will conquer the world." - Pope Blessed Pius IX)
To: sionnsar
the non-acceptance of womens ministry was a recognised theological position. Just out of curiosity: For those who hold that women can't be priestesses let alone bishopesses, who do they consider to be the Presiding Bishop of TEC? And how can two mutually exclusive theological positions be legitimate?
To: sionnsar
That's just great. Bishop Williams rejects healthy, hetrosexual women as priests, but apparently is OK with an alcoholic, divorced, fornicating, homosexual male bishop.
5 posted on
01/09/2007 4:01:22 PM PST by
SuzyQue
(Remember to think.)
To: sionnsar
Traditionalists won a victory against the liberal American branch
of Anglicanism yesterday when a panel set up by the Archbishop of
Canterbury ruled that they could not be compelled to accept women priests.
"Choice" for conservatives.
Sounds good to me.
15 posted on
01/12/2007 6:10:43 PM PST by
VOA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson