Replies

"(For both Anglicanism and Roman Catholicism, faith is a response to God's grace. For Rome, however, faith is not, in the first instance trust in God's promise of imputed righteousness.)."
Is this something that is universally believed among Anglicans? It certainly seems to be on the Protestant edge of the "via media" if it is.

Something non-Anglicans tend to forget is that there are two main groups within Anglicanism: the Evangelical and the Anglo-Catholic. It is almost two churches in one, though perhaps less so than when the Elizabethan Compromise first came down.

Dr. Sanders is definitely centered in the Evangelical wing, the more Protestant element of Anglicanism, and some of what I see here is more likely representative of that wing than Anglicanism as a whole.

it isn't always easy to see clearly from this side of the Tiber to the opposite bank of the Thames.

Sometimes it's not easy to see one bank of the Thames from the other bank of the Thames. *\;-)

Something non-Anglicans tend to forget is that there are two main groups within Anglicanism: the Evangelical and the Anglo-Catholic. It is almost two churches in one, though perhaps less so than when the Elizabethan Compromise first came down.

Dr. Sanders is definitely centered in the Evangelical wing, the more Protestant element of Anglicanism, and some of what I see here is more likely representative of that wing than Anglicanism as a whole.

I'm aware of the two sides; the problem that I still have is trying to understand to what degree any part of Anglicanism can speak for any other part, especially on matters of doctrine. I suspected that he was part of that Evangelical branch because of the arguments and terminology that he is using. Thank you for clearing that up.

Sometimes it's not easy to see one bank of the Thames from the other bank of the Thames. *\;-)

Well put. The more that unfolds with Bp. Robinson, Bp. Schori, and others, that's starting to become rather evident. We were fortunate to have Bishop Harvey (retired Bishop of Eastern Newfoundland) visit my college and give a couple of talks; that is the impression that he left us with too.

Sanders provides a fair treatment of the subject with the caveat that his point of reference is the Anglican "reformers". As you point out, there are two wings of Anglicanism. Although birthed during the reformation, Anglicanism's birth was the result of a political act and not a theological one. As the entire nation was converted to Anglicanism, that conversion included Christians on both sides of the theological debate.

Thus, Sanders provides a sort of half answer. The issue must be addressed using a different set of assumptions for those Anglicans who were not in the camp of reformed theology.