Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: blue-duncan
Well, so much for the "tradition" of apostolic succession!

If you knew the fathers, you would know that nomination of candidates for the episcopal office by the laity was not uncommon, but that ordination of the selected candidate was always by a bishop, not by the laity (since laity were not themselves ordained, they could not give what they did not have).

-A8

389 posted on 12/14/2006 12:48:02 PM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies ]


To: adiaireton8

that chapter also clarifies how the earliest Christians understood Paul's teaching of the requirements to be a bishop.


394 posted on 12/14/2006 12:54:11 PM PST by Nihil Obstat (viva il papa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]

To: adiaireton8; nanetteclaret; xzins; Dr. Eckleburg

Well all I know is what the Didache says since I was directed to that for the authentic tradition of the early church and from what it says it is the church that appoints the deacons and bishops. It says nothing about ordinations by the bishops or other ordained persons. In fact it lists them as appointed like the deacons, teachers and prophets just as the bible says.


507 posted on 12/14/2006 6:31:44 PM PST by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson