Dear xzins,
"In general, I think the laws of decorum have been followed."
I disagree.
The Religion Moderator, to his credit, has deleted at least a few posts that were truly vulgar and nasty.
Post #76 was pretty darned explicit, but fortunately, it's now deleted.
There were a couple of other intrustions by Protestants that were rather less than decorous, as well. Actually, some of them were just pretty disgusting.
It's a darned shame that that kind of nonsense goes on in an unprotected thread.
I really don't believe that this thread should have been a caucus thread. But I really don't believe that posters who post filth, especially aimed at what others hold sacred or venerable, should be permitted to post at all on the Religion Forum, and I believe that should be made clear in the rules of the forum.
sitetest
Site, as I wrote, I don't read all the posts, and I did not see those. I do think that coarse language is a violation of scripture. I do trust the mod, though, to police that kind of thing and apparently it's been done. If there are other examples of posts that you find distasteful but have not been deleted, I'd like to have you point me to them.
Filth is filth and is wrong.
This might have been more peaceful for all concerned had it become a caucus thread.