Nowhere does Calvin affirm the noxious belief in the Immaculate Conception of Mary which states Mary was herself conceived without sin and did not suffer from Original Sin; the non-birth birth of Jesus Christ whereby Jesus did not disturb Mary's physical virginity; or the Assumption of Mary which dares to say another human being other than Christ rose bodily into heaven -- all concoctions of fanciful mischief and damning error.
I agree that there has been a lot of debate regarding the Assumption. However, as YOUR POST CLEARLY PROVES, the Assumption was discussed at least fifteen centuries BEFORE it was defined. So, why do you continue to act as if it was somehow "invented" in 1950?