Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex; Kolokotronis; Blogger; Mad Dawg; Quix
I enumerated though the things on which, to avoid vainpopery, you need to become more modest: Stick to "I think that the scripture without the oral tradition or the institution of the Church is sufficient for understanding Christ"; "I think that faith alone is necessary for salvation", "I don't think praying to saints is a good idea", etc.

This was originally in response to my saying that we did not want or need a Pope. I'm still not certain of the connection. Does this mean that only the Pope may declare anything with confidence? Do you want us to preface every statement with "I think" or "I suppose" in order to be consistent with our claim of not being our own popes? :) That wouldn't make sense to me. Our authority is scripture, yours is that plus more. We both use our respective authorities to declare our views.

7,794 posted on 01/27/2007 5:17:13 PM PST by Forest Keeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7445 | View Replies ]


To: Forest Keeper; Kolokotronis; Blogger; Mad Dawg; Quix
only the Pope may declare anything with confidence?

In Catholic debate, the Pope is the last instance. All disputes previously unresolved end in him. So, one can have confidence, inasmuch as he knows the mind of the Church as expressed by the Pope.

Again, -- I said it before -- this "everyone's a pope" rap is a caricature. It is only accurate on some metaphorical level. When someone tells me "The Holy Ghost taught me that 'by works a man is justified; and not by faith only' (James 2:24) means the opposite of what it states" all I can say is, -- Gee, who made you pope?

7,812 posted on 01/27/2007 7:35:46 PM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7794 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson