Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad Dawg

I kind of agree with our Orthodox brothers on the quasi-philosophical discussion of the Eucharist per Acquinas. I wish it were not so analyzed as it cannot be known using the tools of reason.

However, I hope they can sympathize with the West and see, per this discussion, how the necessity arises.


6,751 posted on 01/18/2007 1:35:58 PM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6750 | View Replies ]


To: D-fendr
I don't want in any way to take away from the escellence of what aquinas did, but sometimes he does strike me as a kid with a new toy. "Hey, look at what I can do with my new Aristotle that I got for Christmas!

And, yeah, precisely: there's a need for some explanation which deals with some of the misconceptions.

6,754 posted on 01/18/2007 1:52:48 PM PST by Mad Dawg ('Shut up,' he explained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6751 | View Replies ]

To: D-fendr; Mad Dawg

"However, I hope they can sympathize with the West and see, per this discussion, how the necessity arises."

You Latins care way too much about what your disobedient and obstinate children think! You know what Aquinas is trying to explain and why. So do we. You think to explain The Mystery is important; we don't. "Protestants" often deny the Objective Truth of the Eucharist. We don't care, really, what they believe as long as they leave us and ours alone with our beliefs.


6,760 posted on 01/18/2007 3:40:59 PM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6751 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson