if you want to see brazen personal attacks check out your post 6056.
if you want to see brazen personal attacks check out your post 6056.
= = = =
REALLY? This is the closest possible to such from that post . . . and if this qualifies . . . then evidently the
MAD RUBBER DICTIONARY MAN has struck again! LOL
So . . . is the doctrine you are espousing
THAT
I should pay attention to St Paul when he's giving his personal opinion about women in a local historical context as though it were the 10 Commandments from Mr Sinai
BUT IGNORE ST PAUL when he very sternly exhorts us to be charitable and conciliatory about relatively minor differences of interpretation about Scriptural principles and spiritual life?
And, please, pray tell . . . what are we to use to guide us in such
ARBITRARY PICKING AND CHOOSING from St Paul?
I don't suppose I really expected a reply to my points. Those being so extremely rare.
But it would have been nice.
Uhhhhh, Kawaii? Where was the personal attack in that post? Quix said what Paul said (with a little embellishment that was not directed at any specific person) and then asked you whether we should take Paul's comments about women as the 10 commandments while ignoring other parts of Paul's epistles.
If you think it was a personal attack, ping the Religion Moderator. I doubt if he/she would agree.