[adiaireton8]

FK, Yes, or No: Could God have prevented Mary from being ceremonially unclean upon the birth of Jesus?

-A8

[bornacatholic]

It reveals so much more than that, all of which I gained a sense of way too early on. This need of theirs to pristinate Mary, to pristinate her hymen is at its core, that which is the reason for their pederasty scandal, for their incredible propensity for cruelty, as I and many other catholic kids experienced, most of which stems from their perversion of the sexual impulse in man.

*See, you, as a convert, weren't taught of all this as a kid. Aren't you happy?

Before converting, did you consider just how evil we are? I mean you threw-in with a gang of vicious,cruel, sexual perverts who are obsessed with Mary's purity. Didn't you know the Doctrine of Mary's Perpetual Virginity, formulated at an Ecumenical Council, was but a ploy to trick men into pederasty and homosexuality?

Talk about wishing others glad tidings :)

[Forest Keeper]

FK, Yes, or No: Could God have prevented Mary from being ceremonially unclean upon the birth of Jesus?

Yes. For one thing He could have written in an exception to His law. But it appears that He chose not to do that. Since Mary complied with the law it is reasonable to infer that the birth was of a normal type, and there was blood. We don't have to add anything special to arrive at that conclusion.

I don't think this is at all comparable to Jesus and His baptism. There we are given specific information in scripture, i.e. that He WAS God, such that He did not "need" to be baptized. With Mary, we are given no such information that leads to an exception.