Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Blogger
Are you saying that Paul made it up and that the gospels are the only rule?

+Paul's ministry is decidely distinct from other Apostles (for obvious reasons). The Gospels simply tell us what the Apostles remember Christ doing and saying. +Paul actually interprets what Christ did and said.

+Paul is the one who gets into the nitty-gritty stuff, such as chastity, celibacy, women not being allowed to speak in church, dispensing with the Law, no need for sacrifices (Heb 10 again), and so on.

This stuff is night and day different from the Gospels. But, +Paul was commissioned and sent to sell the dying Church in Israel to the Gentiles. He knew that the Gentiles will not accept Judaic dietary practices and circumcision, and he urged the Apostles in Jerusalem to change or perish.

Let's face it: if I have to make a distinction between the Church and Protestants, I would say the Church is mostly based on Gospels; the Protestants mostly on Paul. Take out the Gospels and the Church is dead. Take out +Paul and Protestanstism vanishes!

The Gospels are about Christ. The Epistles are what +Paul makes of Christ. Now, having said that, he may have well been inspired and his words are those of God. That's the position the Church has held (although Hebrews were probably not written by +Paul), and still holds.

+Paul saved the Church from certain extinction in Israel and in that he is next to +Peter as far as the Church is concerned. Other than that, I will be honest, I have problems with many things +Paul says, but as always I defer to the Church and trust that, although not obvious or often talked about, the Church sees no problems with Heb 10 and similar chapters.

5,814 posted on 01/13/2007 9:05:47 PM PST by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5798 | View Replies ]


To: kosta50

Peter also referred to Paul's apistles as Scripture. P

Kosta, the thing I do not understand is why you see a lack of harmony between the two. It isn't like Paul is presenting some new point. ALL of Scripture is a harmony pointing to Christ and our life in Him. Protestants accept both The Gospels and the Epistles and interpret both in light of the whole. Such is Sola Scriptura. Our "proof texting" is not done in a vacuum. We look at all of Scripture to see what Scripture testifies of itself. You look to your church to interpret what Scripture means. There is the difference.


5,816 posted on 01/13/2007 9:11:07 PM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5814 | View Replies ]

To: kosta50

That'sa verya interestinga posta (Lingua Italio-Greek).

Several good points to consider there. Thanks.


5,857 posted on 01/14/2007 3:03:10 AM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5814 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson