To: blue-duncan; P-Marlowe; Forest Keeper; wagglebee; Kolokotronis; Agrarian; bornacatholic; annalex
To be accurate, she was the bearer of the Logos, the Word, that became flesh, not God. It was not the triune God but the second person of the Trinity that assumed human nature, body and soul P-Marlowe, you just stated that Incarnate Logos is not God! Lord have mercy!
2,936 posted on
12/24/2006 12:19:04 PM PST by
kosta50
(Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
To: kosta50; P-Marlowe
I think (I hope) that by 'God' he meant more specifically the "Trinity". I don't think He was intending to deny the deity of the Logos. I think he just wasn't as specific and careful as he could have been.
-A8
2,939 posted on
12/24/2006 12:28:50 PM PST by
adiaireton8
("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
To: P-Marlowe; Forest Keeper; wagglebee; Kolokotronis; Agrarian; bornacatholic; annalex; adiaireton8
P-Marlowe, my apologies for having mistaken you foir blue-duncan in 2936.
2,940 posted on
12/24/2006 12:29:38 PM PST by
kosta50
(Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
To: kosta50; P-Marlowe; Forest Keeper; wagglebee; Kolokotronis; Agrarian; bornacatholic; annalex
"P-Marlowe, you just stated that Incarnate Logos is not God! Lord have mercy!"
It was not P-M that said that. If you read the whole statement you will find that what is said it was not God, i.e. the God head, but the second person of the trinity, and then not His divine nature, but His human nature.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson