To: P-Marlowe; kosta50
I think Kosta meant there was a time when the Incarnation was not, ie before Jesus's conception. The second person of the Trinity existed, but the Incarnation happened at a specific time.
2,503 posted on
12/20/2006 2:12:21 PM PST by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: redgolum; P-Marlowe
I think Kosta meant there was a time when the Incarnation was not, ie before Jesus's conception. The second person of the Trinity existed, but the Incarnation happened at a specific timedM Thank you redgolum. Perhaps I didn't say it clearly enough: there was a time when the Incarnate Christ was not Incarnate. As the 2nd Person of the Holy Trinity, He has no beginning and no end. He does have a beginning as the Incarnate 2nd perosn of the Holy trinity.
2,574 posted on
12/20/2006 9:00:38 PM PST by
kosta50
(Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson