To: P-Marlowe; Salvation; NYer; adiaireton8; Kolokotronis; spunkets; Blogger; xzins; blue-duncan; ...
"God would not be a trinity, unless He was born of woman."... "In order for God to be a trinity, the man part must exist."
This gets ranked with the immaculate hymen as something entirely new to me. I had no idea that this would be RC teaching.
I've pinged some other RC's (and one Ortho) to see if they believe this.
Personally, I don't think Spunkets is right about RC teaching.
2,386 posted on
12/20/2006 4:44:21 AM PST by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
To: xzins
Gee whiz. That one is Bizarre.
I guess what this person is getting at is that there would be no God the Son without the incarnation. Thus, it is a denial of the eternal preexistence of the Son. Nevermind that the Bible refers to Him as the creator. Nevermind that when earth was created, God said "Let US make..."
Is this normative RC teaching?
To: xzins; P-Marlowe; Salvation; NYer; adiaireton8; Kolokotronis; spunkets; Blogger; blue-duncan
this would be RC teaching Would not be. The Triune God exists eternally and predates the Creation. "I was there at the beginning".
To: xzins
" Personally, I don't think Spunkets is right about RC teaching."I'm not giving RC teaching. I can't make head, or tails out of their concept of trinity. If you have one that contrasts with what I've said, post it and point out the particulars.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson