Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Blogger
As long as you admit that Jesus Christ, true Man and true God, one person, was born of Mary, but yet Mary was not the mother of the divinity, you are meeting the definition of the term "Mother of God".

In that it is a confusing term, and one that tends to make some believe that it means Mary was the mother of the second person of the Trinity, it should be used in the right context of Christlogical theology. If you are afraid that some may take the title "Mother of God" the wrong way, you are correct in stating that meaning differently to that person or group. Just be sure you do so in a manner that preserves the undivided person of Jesus.
1,962 posted on 12/18/2006 1:58:58 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1946 | View Replies ]


To: redgolum
and one that tends to make some believe that it means Mary was the mother of the second person of the Trinity

Mary is the mother of the Second Person of the Trinity. There are not two persons in Jesus. The one person in Jesus is the Second Person of the Trinity, and that is the Person of whom Mary is the mother.

-A8

1,964 posted on 12/18/2006 2:02:29 PM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1962 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson