" IF Jesus was Jude's brother through Mary, Jude would CERTAINLY call himself Jesus' brother, not James"
Incredible, Paul calls James, Jesus' brother, but that's not good enough since he's referred to as Jesus' brother and not referred to as "Mary's son" but now Jude can't be Jesus' brother since he is referred to as James' brother, not and not referred to as Jesus' brother.
Yes, common sense is quite incredible...
As I told Blogger, if I have two blood brothers, one the President of the US, and the other a garbage truck driver named Fred, does it not strike you as odd that I would only mention Fred as my brother in a letter that is supposed to preach the Word of God to the entire Church??? That sounds like a grand omission - or quite simply, James was NOT Jesus' blood brother...
We have no evidence that Mary had other kids. This is clearly a Protestant tradition of late based on presumption. Scripture alone does not speak definitively on the subject.
Regards