Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Blogger
It doesn't deny Christ's divinity. It denies Mary's motherhood of God.

If Mary is not the mother of God, in other words, if the child whom Mary birthed is not God, then one of three heresies necessarily follows, as I pointed out in #1656.

As to God and Father not being identical - are you now separating the Father from the Godhead???

No. The Father is God, but the 'is' is not an is of [Leibnizian] identity. For the Logos is God too, but the Logos is not [numerically] identical to the Father.

Or are you backtracking and saying the Father is only a part of the Godhead and can be separated from the Son? (i.e., component parts of the one unit)

No. I'm not saying that at all.

-A8

1,739 posted on 12/17/2006 9:42:11 PM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1730 | View Replies ]


To: adiaireton8

Incorrect. Jesus would have been God had he never been incarnated. He was God always. Never wasn't God. Therefore, Mary was not the mother of Him AS GOD. She was the mother of Him AS MAN. He was both. She was the mother of one of those elements and gave it life. His humanness had a beginning. His Godhood did not. The divine part of Christ eternally preexisted Mary so therefore could not have been sired by her.


1,742 posted on 12/17/2006 9:49:13 PM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1739 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson