Of course, we are all busy, and I apologize if you think I implied otherwise. However, I do note that you have taken up conversation with other people after my post to you. Does that mean that you have forgotten our discussion or do you find that your time is better spent attacking your ideas of Catholicism rather than defending your own incorrect point of view which I corrected?
Don't believe me, if you think I jest. If you want to learn the truth, take a break from this forum, and pick up some of the Church Fathers and read them for yourself, rather than William Webster's out of context clips... If you dare to learn the truth. I say that because, if you are honest and open, you will be forced to make a decision - to continue to lie, or to change your opinion. And the later is more difficult, I assure you. I was there once.
Regards
Of course, we are all busy, and I apologize if you think I implied otherwise. However, I do note that you have taken up conversation with other people after my post to you.
Well, maybe try noting that when someone gets busy, as I SAID, things get overlooked, and missed. It's as simple as that. Try it sometime rather than jumping to a conclusion that is false and then used as a snippy, petty smear.
You haven't "corrected" anything.
Don't believe me, if you think I jest. If you want to learn the truth, take a break from this forum, and pick up some of the Church Fathers and read them for yourself, rather than William Webster's out of context clips... If you dare to learn the truth. I say that because, if you are honest and open, you will be forced to make a decision - to continue to lie, or to change your opinion. And the later is more difficult, I assure you. I was there once.
I have read then and still do, having been reading them for the past 10 years, and find that Roman Catholicism distorts them, takes them out of context and reads later Roman inventions back into them where they do not exist, just as Roman Catholicism does the Scriptures and history.