Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex; wmfights; Forest Keeper; blue-duncan; Quix; Kolokotronis; Dr. Eckleburg
A better example would be the apostolic succession of the Anglican Church, which was valid for a while.

How on earth can "apostolic succession" be valid "for a while"? Either you can trace yourselves to the apostles or you can't. Validity, in my mind would not enter into the issue.

14,290 posted on 05/08/2007 4:28:49 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14280 | View Replies ]


To: HarleyD; wmfights; Forest Keeper; blue-duncan; Quix; Kolokotronis; Dr. Eckleburg; jo kus; ...

I defer to the posts of others that corrected me; this however, I can answer: apostolic succession requires two things: valid consecration and unity of doctrine. It is possible to consecrate a bishop or even a succession of bishops who drift into heresy overtime. At that point firther consecrations cease to be valid.


14,293 posted on 05/08/2007 5:10:33 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14290 | View Replies ]

To: HarleyD; annalex; wmfights; Forest Keeper; blue-duncan; Quix; Kolokotronis; Dr. Eckleburg
I suspect it has something to do with the English Civil War, and the expulsion of the Anglican bishops after Cromwell’s Puritians won. At least I have seen it expressed that way once.
14,316 posted on 05/09/2007 6:27:20 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14290 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson