To: annalex; wmfights; Forest Keeper; blue-duncan; Quix; Kolokotronis; Dr. Eckleburg
A better example would be the apostolic succession of the Anglican Church, which was valid for a while. How on earth can "apostolic succession" be valid "for a while"? Either you can trace yourselves to the apostles or you can't. Validity, in my mind would not enter into the issue.
To: HarleyD; wmfights; Forest Keeper; blue-duncan; Quix; Kolokotronis; Dr. Eckleburg; jo kus; ...
I defer to the posts of others that corrected me; this however, I can answer: apostolic succession requires two things: valid consecration and unity of doctrine. It is possible to consecrate a bishop or even a succession of bishops who drift into heresy overtime. At that point firther consecrations cease to be valid.
To: HarleyD; annalex; wmfights; Forest Keeper; blue-duncan; Quix; Kolokotronis; Dr. Eckleburg
I suspect it has something to do with the English Civil War, and the expulsion of the Anglican bishops after Cromwell’s Puritians won. At least I have seen it expressed that way once.
14,316 posted on
05/09/2007 6:27:20 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson