Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Blogger; Dr. Eckleburg; wmfights; HarleyD; Alex Murphy; Gamecock; Frumanchu

I notice how quickly you can get off track.

Deal with Hebrews first, and then we can talk about Zechariah, the priesthood, prophecies, etc in the light of what we learn from Hebrews and the rest of the NT.


14,236 posted on 05/08/2007 10:35:05 AM PDT by topcat54 ("... knowing that the testing of your faith produces patience." (James 1:3))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14232 | View Replies ]


To: topcat54

Hebrews is not in a vacuum. You have to take the Bible as a whole. I am on track. You are out of context.


14,237 posted on 05/08/2007 10:35:57 AM PDT by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14236 | View Replies ]

To: topcat54; HarleyD; 1000 silverlings; Lee N. Field; ears_to_hear
Deal with Hebrews first, and then we can talk about Zechariah, the priesthood, prophecies, etc in the light of what we learn from Hebrews and the rest of the NT.

I've noticed whenever these dispensational topics are being discussed, the emphasis is always on the Old Testament to the very real exclusion of the New Testament. It's almost as if they stopped reading right before Matthew.

Every word of Hebrews denies the dispensational error of a reconstructed blood Israel. The only blood that matters is the blood of Christ. The only covenant now in place is the New Covenant.

"In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away." -- Hebrews 8:13

14,242 posted on 05/08/2007 11:05:42 AM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14236 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson