Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: topcat54; Blogger; wmfights; Kolokotronis; Forest Keeper; HarleyD; Alex Murphy; Gamecock

“The early disciples did routinely celebrate the sacrament. It seems a common occurrence with the gathering of believers in the book of Acts. The fellowships mention the “breaking of bread” (communion)”.

Then how did the disciples on the road to Emmaus know Jesus by the “breaking of bread” if they were not present at the Last Supper? “Breaking of bread” was the name of the common brotherhood rite of the time. They must have participated in the rite with Jesus before the Last Supper in order to recognize His officiating. Just the actions of the disciples present and the practice of the Corinthian church some 25 years after the Last Supper would say that there was not a “sacrament” and conferred no grace on the participants.

The Last Supper was not the Passover meal but the meal the evening before Passover.


14,172 posted on 05/07/2007 9:16:12 PM PDT by blue-duncan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14169 | View Replies ]


To: blue-duncan
The Last Supper was not the Passover meal but the meal the evening before Passover.

Maybe.

14,173 posted on 05/07/2007 10:02:20 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14172 | View Replies ]

To: blue-duncan; Blogger; wmfights; Kolokotronis; Forest Keeper; HarleyD; Alex Murphy; Gamecock
Then how did the disciples on the road to Emmaus know Jesus by the “breaking of bread” if they were not present at the Last Supper?

I’m not following you. The answer is given in Luke 24. it was not merely by the breaking of bread, since it says, “Then their eyes were opened and they knew Him; and He vanished from their sight. And they said to one another, ‘Did not our heart burn within us while He talked with us on the road, and while He opened the Scriptures to us?’” (vv. 31,32) It was through the preached word that Christ revealed Himself to them.

The sacraments without the preached word are of no effect. “Faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.” The sacraments merely strengthen the faith that exists in the life of the believer.

They must have participated in the rite with Jesus before the Last Supper in order to recognize His officiating.

That is an argument from silence. First of all their eyes were supernaturally prevented from seeing who He really was (v. 16). And as I said it was not the breaking of bread which opened their eyes, it was the preaching of the Scripture to them. It was a supernatural act.

Just the actions of the disciples present and the practice of the Corinthian church some 25 years after the Last Supper would say that there was not a “sacrament” and conferred no grace on the participants.

I don’t see that clearly from any Scripture.

The Last Supper was not the Passover meal but the meal the evening before Passover.

Didn’t say it was. I merely said it replaced the Passover in the communal life God’s people.

14,186 posted on 05/08/2007 7:28:17 AM PDT by topcat54 ("... knowing that the testing of your faith produces patience." (James 1:3))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson