Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: adiaireton8
In the same work you quoted. I should have (for the sake of clarity) pointed out that he believed the only non sinful act was that of procreation. Sex for any other reason he considered a venial sin.

Marital intercourse for the sake of procreation has no fault attached to it, but for the satisfying of lust, even with one's husband or wife, for the faith of the bed, is venially sinful; but adultery or fornication is mortally sinful. Moreover, continence from all intercourse is even better than marital intercourse itself, even if it takes place for the sake of procreation. But even though continence is better, to pay the dues of marriage is no crime, but to demand it beyond the necessity of procreation is a venial sin, although fornication and adultery are mortally sinful.

Slightly off topic, but I REALLY wish there was a searchable online database of Augustine's (and others) writings. Would make things easier.

Some of Augustine's views came from his past association with the Manichean's (spelling is wrong), and his past lover.
1,220 posted on 12/12/2006 12:16:58 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1218 | View Replies ]


To: redgolum
First, what you are saying here (#1220) is quite different from what you said in #1209. Second, Augustine is exactly right. Contrary to the spirit of our age, sexual pleasure is not an end in itself, and therefore to treat it as an end in itself is to sin.

-A8

1,221 posted on 12/12/2006 12:31:11 PM PST by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1220 | View Replies ]

To: redgolum; adiaireton8
Marital intercourse for the sake of procreation has no fault attached to it, but for the satisfying of lust, even with one's husband or wife, for the faith of the bed, is venially sinful; but adultery or fornication is mortally sinful. Moreover, continence from all intercourse is even better than marital intercourse itself, even if it takes place for the sake of procreation. But even though continence is better, to pay the dues of marriage is no crime, but to demand it beyond the necessity of procreation is a venial sin, although fornication and adultery are mortally sinful.

It should be noted that Paul's viewpoint is somewhat different ...

Paul writes that marital intercourse should be consistent within the marriage, ... and that neither party should withhold from the other, except for mutually agreed upon periods of prayer and/or fasting, ... and even then encourages the couple to come back together in a timely manner so as to avoid the temptations of Satan.
1 Corinthians 7:3 Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.

4 The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.

5 Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.

1,234 posted on 12/12/2006 2:34:56 PM PST by Quester
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1220 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson