Replies

Never heard of [Cyril Lucas] before He was a 17th c. abomination who, embracing Calvinism, through the help of the craftiest master of lies, managed to worm his way into the Patriarchy of Constantinople like some many other satanic servants before him, and tried to change the Orthodox Church into a Protestant folly.

Well at least you guys now have a major Catechism with the truth in it so you are 'without excuse'(Rom.1).

I expect to see Cyril at the Judgment Seat of Christ (Rom.14:10) which is for saved people.

I expect many from the Orthodox faith who read and believed what he taught in his Catechism will be there as well.

you guys now have a major Catechism with the truth in it so you are 'without excuse'(Rom.1)

That catechism is not Lucas's but Philaret's. You are mixing apples and oranges. No Orthodox follows that 19th c. Catechism, at least not as far as Philaret's assertion concerning OT canon is concerned. Like Cyril Lucas, and numerous heresies before him, it was short-lived.

I expect to see Cyril at the Judgment Seat of Christ (Rom.14:10) which is for saved people. I expect many from the Orthodox faith who read and believed what he taught in his Catechism will be there as well

So being saved is now tied to a paritcular Protestant sect (Calvinism), or (Pharisaical version of the) Jewish canon? And here I go thinking all along that Protestants tie being saved with just plain faith in Christ, theology notwithstanding!

I wish you guys would make up your minds. Or does it change with the days of the week and the medications taken?