Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HarleyD

HarleyD, I'm thinking that to say my Church is very close to this is to make a statement which raises the anxiety level but conveys little reliable data. Yeah, some people are for it, and J2P2 seemed especially sympathetic. But I just don't know one way or another how "close" they are, and doubt there's a way to know. What do the Vegas odds-makers say?


11,492 posted on 03/20/2007 4:43:25 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Tactical shotty, Marlin 1894c, S&W 686P, Sig 226 & 239, Beretta 92fs & 8357, Glock 22, & attitude!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11488 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawg
Didn't the church pass the Immaculate Conception thingy around 1952? Ten years before that happened I'm sure people probably said the same thing, "What makes you think the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception will take place?"

It all comes down to politics. If the Catholics get enough Cardinals to buy into it -*-POOF-*- new Canon. All they need to do is pull together some savvy writers to make it all sound legit, like the early church fathers always believed it. Heck, now-a-days they simple say it's new teaching because the early fathers couldn't grasp the concept. The Church doesn't even try to tie it to the fathers anymore.

Mary will be eventually declared co-redeptix. It just takes time. One doesn't have to be a prophet to see which ways the political winds are blowing.

11,495 posted on 03/20/2007 5:04:15 AM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11492 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson