[kosta50]

I know what you are hinting at (blood and guts), but He actually tells us a few chapters later. I would expect a Protestant, and a Reformed at that, to know what a simple EO is talking about. :)

[Dr. Eckleburg]

I know what you are hinting at (blood and guts), but He actually tells us a few chapters later. I would expect a Protestant, and a Reformed at that, to know what a simple EO is talking about. :)

I'm not hinting at anything. I'm asking you about your statement that Christ fulfilled the Law. What was that Law? What did it say? I know my answer and I bet I know just about every Protestant's answer on this forum. I know my children's answer and my pastor's answer and our neighbor's answer. They all have a really good and clear answer to that question.

Perhaps you regret referencing Matthew 5:17. Do you want to withdraw your statement that Christ came to fulfill the Law, since you are struggling (or somehow refusing) to say what that Law was?

What was the Law Christ came to fulfill, Kosta? Since some would say this is the heart of the Gospel, the reason for Christ's life and death and resurrection, it's not a foolish question, but one which all Christians should be able to answer.

What was the Law Christ came to fulfill?