Is that why recent edition of Nestles had to backtrack and put back into its text many TR readings?
The TR is the pure textual line, and any edition (Erasmus, Eliezer, Beza etc) is better then any and every edition of the Critical Text.
We know that by the Bible that comes from each text and the fruit that they bear.
Textus Receptus is based on unreliable sources of the Byzantine-type text, contains flaws and errors of judgment.
I have no idea which portions of Nestles edition had to revised, and what those revisions included, but Alexandrian-type text is the preferred source of modern-day scholars because it is less 'doctored.'
My point is that despite the evidence to the contrary, the offspirng of TR (such as the KJV) persist in keeping Comma Johanneum and Erasmus's own retro-translated (Latin to Greek) section of the Revelation, among other things.