Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Blogger
Yeah, the Aramaic was translated into Greek.

Matt 16:18

Doctrine doesn't "swing with the times." If you think you can prove the Catholic Churfch has changed Doctrine - have at it. Men far more learned than you have tried and failed for centuries.

Your idea of what the Bible is is deficient and your understanding of it woefully wrong.

Begin by telling us your understanding of how the New Testament came into existence.

You even appear to think the Lord designed Scripture so it would invite controversy and disagreements.

BTW, where does your authority come from that allows you to reflexively gainsay protestamt scholars because they do not agree with your personal opinion?

These are educated men..and your theology degree is from what University - and they hold positions of authority as Seminary Professors - and you teach where? - and they beleive they are guided by the Holy Spirit

1,070 posted on 12/11/2006 9:09:53 AM PST by bornacatholic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 988 | View Replies ]


To: bornacatholic

Again. Only a minority believe that it was originally in Aramaic.

Second, I do have an advanced Seminary degree from a well respected institution. I have also taught college before.

Check your personal attacks. As long as they continue, our conversation is through.


1,092 posted on 12/11/2006 12:17:40 PM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1070 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson