Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: blue-duncan
Blue-Duncan,

I have thoroughly researched this, and right off the bat, you have made a mistake - APOCRYPHA... You and your quotes of the Fathers refer to the properly-called "Apocrypha", such as the Gospel of Thomas. Why the Protestants removed the Deuterocanonicals is obviously theological. And by calling them "Apocrypha", they place them in a category of "hidden" or "doubtful". Sorry, the majority of the Deuterocanonicals were not "hidden" or "doubtful". The Book of Wisdom was very well known by the Fathers, as they refer to it over and over again. The Septaugint was widely circulated throughout the Diaspora - more Jews lived OUTSIDE of Palestine, so it was the Bible of the Jews. They certainly WERE aware of the books within!

And can you please drop the silly argument "the Jews didn't accept the Apocrypha, so neither will I". REMEMBER THE JEWS DIDN'T ACCEPT CHRIST, EITHER...

Regards

10,372 posted on 02/14/2007 3:15:53 PM PST by jo kus (Humility is present when one debases oneself without being obliged to do so- St.Chrysostom; Phil 2:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10369 | View Replies ]


To: jo kus; Dr. Eckleburg; blue-duncan; Forest Keeper; HarleyD; Quix

What theology? I have read them, doesn't seem to be much there other than dreams and visions, angels and anecdotes. I do remember one famous quote from supposedly Jesus, "If God had wanted you to have a foreskin, you would have been born with one."


10,375 posted on 02/14/2007 3:30:48 PM PST by 1000 silverlings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10372 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson