Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HarleyD; 1000 silverlings
Oh, please. -t w-ht p--nt d-d th- Gr--ks p-t th- v-w-ls b-ck -n th- scr-pt-r-s? Faith comes from God's word, not from tradition

LOL!!! HD, the Greeks always HAD vowels. They didn't use accents. Accents change a word is pronounced but they don't change words; vowels do.

There is a difference how you pronounce tomato and whether a shp is a shIp, shOp or shApE.

If you meant it as a joke, it worked. I laughed very loud. :)

10,180 posted on 02/13/2007 7:02:30 AM PST by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10179 | View Replies ]


To: kosta50; 1000 silverlings
There is a difference how you pronounce tomato and whether a shp is a shIp, shOp or shApE.

Well, what translation is the best? I suppose a number of Orthodox who can’t read Greek would like to know. And, if none of them are any good, why hasn’t the Orthodox developed one? I realize the printing press was just invented only 600 years ago but I would think that by now it would have been done.

The fact of the matter, after some research, the Orthodox puts no more emphasis on the word of God than any other writings. See Holy Scripture In The Orthodox Church Your posts are evident of the philosophical views the Orthodox have with the word of God. It a way it would be amusing if it wasn’t so sad. The Orthodox will defend writings such as the deutercanoncials and then turn around and say they based everything on tradition, and that the Bible, in essence, is junk. That, of course raises the question how do you know what you are reading is the scriptures since (I’m sure) you haven’t personally examined the Byzantine text. This is a very sad commentary on a Church that was started by fathers that held the scriptures in high regards-so much so they declared them inspired. But, this has all been conveniently forgotten by the Orthodox.

Translations may vary but people can examine the original writings, text, and tenses as I’ve stated on another post. I don’t believe you answered that. Certainly the author of my article seems to know what the correct text was. To be sure there are some passages that are confusing and conflict but for the most part those rectify themselves in time with study and, as I have recently learned, the right soteriology. But I came to the conclusion on day 1 of my Christian life that if a person can’t believe the entire word of God, then they can’t believe any of it. With study and time a person can know what is written and translations don't matter because God will help a person know the truth. I'm evident of that.

I will also add that denying the viability of the word of God is, in my opinion, one of the worst offenses a person can do. There are biblical reasons for this view. I won’t say anything more than that.

10,187 posted on 02/13/2007 10:44:55 AM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson