But, as we have seen, the church, in order to write scripture in conflict with or absence from scripture, must have authority over the souls of men that has been otherwise assigned by natural and spiritual law, acknowledged by the Gospels, and further described by the Acts and letters.
Any scripture, therefore, that has been interpreted to mean otherwise is ipso facto wrong.
The foundation is destroyed, so that built on the foundation likewise falls.
We've discussed this great detail on other threads, by your own insistence, and over my objections that it is a waste of time, you being invested in the Catholic dogma and can't hear or see any thing that opposes it.
So, why ping me to this thread, which simply builds on a destroyed foundation?
I pinged you because our conversation started with your questons about the communion of saints, and this article provides a clear and comprehensive answer.
The foundation is "faith once delivered to rhe saints", not the scrupture. However, this is a chance to discuss the scripture as pertains to the issue. I do not see a substantive scriptural rebuttal, only handwringing over how the Catholic Church is, well, catholic.