I wasn't taking about their money. I'm talking about them ignoring peer review from other creationists and theologians, which seems to be one of the reasons for the split.
It's not just peer-review, it's also censorship. Journal of Creation often rejects very good science that doesn't line up with their own views. For example, there was an article that was rejected by the Journal of Creation which was accepted by a secular mainstream geology journal (he only had to change one word to in the article to get it to pass). The reason that Journal of Creation didn't publish it was because it supported the Walt Brown model.