To: ahadams2; rabscuttle385; cf_river_rat; fgoodwin; secret garden; MountainMenace; ...
Traditional Anglican ping
, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams
if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar
Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
More Anglican articles here
Humor: The Anglican Blue
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
posted on 11/25/2006 5:51:37 PM PST
(?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
Is this specific litigation or just a general preparation? This is a very dangerous road to go down. Congress shall make no law, after all. I don't see how the Judiciary could make a judgment in any case between diocese. Such a decision could be construed to be federal favorism, which IS what Jefferson meant when he spoke about the wall.
posted on 11/25/2006 6:12:00 PM PST
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
If a judge is indeed helping the bishop prepare for litigation, this is an INCREDIBLE violation of judicial ethics.
A judge is supposed to be NEUTRAL - not helping one side.
I hope they figure out who the heck this is, and impeach his black-robed butt. This is beyond evil.
posted on 11/26/2006 5:04:50 PM PST
((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson