Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Los Angeles: Episcopal diocese may defy national edict
VirtueOnline-News ^ | 11/24/2006 | Bettye Wells Miller

Posted on 11/24/2006 5:29:04 PM PST by sionnsar

The Press-Enterprise
November 23, 2006

Southern California Episcopalians may vote next week to reaffirm that homosexuals are welcome at all levels of the church when the 111th annual convention of the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles meets at the Riverside Convention Center.

A resolution submitted by a Pasadena church leader and an Inglewood priest asks the delegates to dissent from a decision by the General Convention of the Episcopal Church that in June urged restraint in consecrating bishops "whose manner of life presents a challenge to the wider church."

If the resolution passes, diocesan officials would be expected to consecrate new bishops based on their qualifications, not their sexual orientation, said the Rev. Susan Russell, an associate priest at All Saints Episcopal Church in Pasadena.

The ordination of gay clergy and blessings of same-sex unions in some North American parishes and dioceses has become increasingly contentious within the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion, the global network of which the American church is a part.

The June decision by American church policymakers is inconsistent with church law "and our baptismal covenant to love and respect the dignity of every human being," Bob Long, senior warden at the Pasadena church, and the Rev. Altagracia Perez, of Holy Faith Episcopal Church in Inglewood wrote in a resolution that delegates to the Los Angeles Diocese convention will consider Dec. 1 and 2.

The Los Angeles Diocese includes parts of Riverside and San Bernardino counties as well as Los Angeles, Orange, Santa Barbara and Ventura counties.

The resolution asks the local diocese to uphold church law when considering the consecration of new bishops and to reaffirm "the full inclusion of all sisters and brothers in Christ regardless of sexual orientation into all areas of the church."

Seven other dioceses in the U.S. have passed similar resolutions since June.

The Los Angeles Diocese has a history of dissenting from positions of the larger church, she said, including a 1988 statement from the Lambeth Conference of the Anglican Communion that declared homosexuality incompatible with Scripture.

Diocesan spokeswoman Janet Kawamoto said local delegates either will decide not to follow a national resolution that many people find objectionable or decide they are bound to follow the policy because it was passed by the national church.

TOPICS: Mainline Protestant; Other non-Christian
[The degree of dishonesty I perceive exhibited in this article is incredible. Insofar as I know, NO credible Episcopal or Anglican church or province, my own included, discriminates on the basis of "orientation." I'm not familiar with the "1988 statement" (I was paying no attention to ECUSA or her confreres at the time), but somehow I suspect it talks about about homosexual practice and not homosexual orientation. --sionnsar]
1 posted on 11/24/2006 5:29:06 PM PST by sionnsar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ahadams2; rabscuttle385; cf_river_rat; fgoodwin; secret garden; MountainMenace; ...
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar, Huber and newheart.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
More Anglican articles here.

Humor: The Anglican Blue (by Huber)

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

2 posted on 11/24/2006 5:30:12 PM PST by sionnsar (?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

They will at their own peril.

3 posted on 11/24/2006 5:31:19 PM PST by flynmudd (Proud Navy Mom to OSSR Richard T. Blalock-DDG 61)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

What about consecrating adulterers?

4 posted on 11/24/2006 6:15:31 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

What about thieves, rapists and pedophiles?

5 posted on 11/25/2006 1:36:39 AM PST by LibreOuMort (Give me liberty, or give me death! (Patrick Henry))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

ugh. I had a long response typed up. "Stupid is as stupid does" just about sums it up.

Just WHAT are the qualifications of a priest? That they preach a good sermon? Heck, anyone can preach. What is it that sets a priest apart from the rest of the sinners? Certainly unrepentant act(s) of sodomy would DISqualify someone for preisthood in the Christian church as much as would adultery?

6 posted on 11/25/2006 4:46:21 PM PST by Peanut Gallery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson